OpenAI has announced its intent to transition its for-profit arm into a Delaware Public Benefit Corporation (PBC). The decision is aimed at raising the capital needed to remain competitive in the costly artificial intelligence (AI) industry while balancing societal benefits alongside profit-making interests.
What is a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC)?
PBCs are for-profit entities legally required to pursue one or more public benefits, such as social or environmental goals. Unlike traditional corporations, PBCs are obligated to balance profit-making with broader societal interests.
- Historical Context: Delaware amended its general corporation law in 2013 to allow the formation of PBCs.
- Current Landscape: By December 2023, there were 19 publicly traded PBCs in the U.S., according to research by Jens Dammann from the University of Texas.
OpenAI’s Current and Planned Structure
Currently, OpenAI operates as a for-profit entity controlled by a non-profit organization, with a capped profit share for its investors and employees. Under the new structure:
- Ownership: The non-profit will own shares in the for-profit entity, similar to external investors.
- Charitable Funding: The for-profit arm will fund charitable missions in areas like healthcare, education, and science.
- Operational Control: The PBC will manage OpenAI’s business operations, while the non-profit will oversee leadership and staff for charitable initiatives.
Why PBC?
Adopting a PBC structure makes OpenAI more investor-friendly while preserving its commitment to societal impact. Several other companies, such as Anthropic and Elon Musk’s xAI, have similarly adopted the PBC model to align societal goals with shareholder value.
Key Differences: PBCs vs. Other Structures
- PBCs: Have shareholders and are legally required to balance profit-making with societal benefits.
- Non-profits: Do not have shareholders and reinvest profits into their mission. They are often exempt from federal income taxes, unlike PBCs.
Limitations of the PBC Model
Despite its appeal, the PBC structure has certain limitations:
- Mission vs. Profit Conflict: Boards are only required to “balance” mission and profit interests, leaving room for profit to dominate decision-making.
- Lack of Enforcement: The law mandates progress reporting towards public benefit goals but lacks strong enforcement mechanisms.
- Vulnerability to Takeovers: Publicly traded PBCs can be more susceptible to takeovers by bidders citing conflicts between public benefits and profitability.
Expert Insight: Ann Lipton, a corporate law professor at Tulane Law School, notes that the PBC designation mainly serves as a public declaration. “It doesn’t actually have any real enforcement power behind it,” she explains.
Examples of Existing PBCs
- Anthropic and xAI: Both companies are AI-focused competitors of OpenAI.
- Allbirds: A San Francisco-based PBC selling sustainable shoes and apparel made from natural materials.
OpenAI’s move to adopt the PBC model underscores its commitment to maintaining a balance between profitability and public good. While the structure has its limitations, it offers an opportunity for the company to attract investments while staying aligned with its mission of creating and promoting socially beneficial AI technologies.
Add comment